actor: bow at end of performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
bow at end of performance 1.00
bow at end 0.94
bow 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(performer, bow at end)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(performer, bow)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(performer, bow at end)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(performer, bow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(performer, bow at end)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(performer, bow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(performer, bow at end)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(performer, bow)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(actor, bow at end of performance)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(actor, bow at end)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(actor, bow at end)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(actor, bow at end)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(actor, bow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(actor, bow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(actor, bow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow at end)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(performer, bow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(performer, bow at end)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(performer, bow at end)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(actor, bow at end of performance)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(performer, bow)