actor: names under actors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, ethel waters
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
names under actors 1.00
names under wrong actors 0.96
become actors 0.87
date actors 0.87
be better than actors 0.85
be better than young actors 0.84
be better than white actors 0.84
marry other actors 0.81
is actresses 0.80
is actresses good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(actor, names under actors)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(actor, date actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(actor, be better than actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(actor, become actors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(actor, become actors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(actor, become actors)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(actor, become actors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(actor, be better than actors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(actor, date actors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(actor, be better than actors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(actor, date actors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(actor, be better than actors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(actor, date actors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(actor, names under actors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(actor, names under actors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(actor, names under actors)