ad: be at newspaper

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, graphic
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, message
Weight: 0.55
Siblings advertisement
Weight: 0.35
, poster
Weight: 0.31
, young woman
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.31
, senator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at newspaper 1.00
be at in newspaper 0.99
read newspaper 0.93
be print in magazine 0.78
be at magazine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be at newspaper)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be at magazine)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be print in magazine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(advertisement, be print in magazine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be print in magazine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(advertisement, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be at newspaper)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(advertisement, be at magazine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be at magazine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.03
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ad, be at newspaper)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ad, be at in newspaper)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at in newspaper)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ad, be at in newspaper)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ad, be at in newspaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ad, be at newspaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(advertisement, be at newspaper)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(advertisement, be at magazine)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ad, be at newspaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(advertisement, be print in magazine)