:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ad, is banned)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ad, get banned)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ad, get banned)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ad, get banned)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ad, get banned)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ad, is banned)
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ad, is banned)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ad, is banned)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings