ada: have true combo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.63
, programming language
Weight: 0.62
, law
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings english language
Weight: 0.35
, italian language
Weight: 0.35
, lua
Weight: 0.35
, hindi
Weight: 0.35
, yoruba
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have true combo 1.00
have true combo into nsig 0.98
have combo 0.92
have combo into nsig 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ada, have true combo)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ada, have true combo into nsig)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ada, have true combo into nsig)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ada, have combo)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ada, have combo into nsig)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ada, have combo into nsig)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ada, have combo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ada, have true combo into nsig)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ada, have combo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ada, have combo into nsig)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ada, have combo)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ada, have true combo into nsig)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ada, have combo into nsig)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ada, have true combo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ada, have true combo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ada, have true combo)