adaptation: be important for natural selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.67
, script
Weight: 0.61
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, modification
Weight: 0.59
Siblings horror movie
Weight: 0.35
, movie star
Weight: 0.35
, horror movies
Weight: 0.33
, version
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for natural selection 1.00
be important to natural selection 1.00
be natural selection 0.98
be related to natural selection 0.96
help natural selection work 0.95
be important for selection 0.94
relate to natural selection 0.94
be important to selection 0.93
lead to natural selection 0.92
be necessary natural selection occur 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(adaptation, be necessary natural selection occur)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(adaptation, help natural selection work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(adaptation, be natural selection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important to natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(adaptation, relate to natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(adaptation, be natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(adaptation, be related to natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be necessary natural selection occur)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(adaptation, be important to natural selection)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be important to natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(adaptation, help natural selection work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(adaptation, lead to natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(adaptation, relate to natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(adaptation, be necessary natural selection occur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be related to natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(adaptation, relate to natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(adaptation, be related to natural selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(adaptation, help natural selection work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(adaptation, lead to natural selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(adaptation, lead to natural selection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be important to natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be natural selection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be related to natural selection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, lead to natural selection)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, relate to natural selection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, help natural selection work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be necessary natural selection occur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be important for natural selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(adaptation, be important for natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important for natural selection)