address label: be affix to box

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents label
Weight: 0.81
, item
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.57
, information
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dairy product
Weight: 0.33
, identity
Weight: 0.33
, postage stamp
Weight: 0.33
, business card
Weight: 0.32
, symbol
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be affix to box 1.00
be affix to package 0.92
be affix to envelope 0.92
be at box 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(business card, be at box)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(business card, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(business card, be at box)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(address label, be affix to box)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(address label, be affix to package)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(address label, be affix to envelope)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(address label, be affix to envelope)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(address label, be affix to envelope)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(address label, be affix to package)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(address label, be affix to package)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(address label, be affix to envelope)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(address label, be affix to package)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(address label, be affix to box)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(address label, be affix to box)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(address label, be affix to box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(business card, be at box)