adelaide: be called radelaide

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, club
Weight: 0.48
, town
Weight: 0.45
, location
Weight: 0.44
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, melbourne
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called radelaide 1.00
be called city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(perth, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be called city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(auckland, be called city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(auckland, be called city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sydney, be called city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sydney, be called city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(perth, be called city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(perth, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(adelaide, be called radelaide)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be called city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(adelaide, be called city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(adelaide, be called city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(adelaide, be called radelaide)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(auckland, be called city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sydney, be called city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called radelaide)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(perth, be called city)