adelaide: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, club
Weight: 0.48
, town
Weight: 0.45
, location
Weight: 0.44
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, melbourne
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
be best place live 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be best place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(auckland, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(auckland, be best place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sydney, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sydney, be best place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(melbourne, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be best place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(adelaide, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(adelaide, be best place live)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be best place live)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(adelaide, be best place live)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be best place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(adelaide, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(auckland, be best place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sydney, be best place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(melbourne, be best place live)