advantage: determine death

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents opportunity
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.57
, process
Weight: 0.55
Siblings edge
Weight: 0.75
, time zone
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.57
, le
Weight: 0.48
, fixation
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
determine death 1.00
determine survival 0.81
be determined 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(time zone, be determined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(time zone, be determined)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(time zone, be determined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(advantage, determine death)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(advantage, be determined)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(advantage, be determined)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(advantage, be determined)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(advantage, determine survival)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(advantage, determine survival)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(advantage, determine survival)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(advantage, be determined)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(advantage, determine survival)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(advantage, determine death)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(advantage, determine death)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(advantage, determine death)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(time zone, be determined)