advantage: differ from mechanical advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents opportunity
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.57
, process
Weight: 0.55
Siblings edge
Weight: 0.75
, time zone
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.57
, le
Weight: 0.48
, fixation
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from mechanical advantage 1.00
differ from ideal mechanical advantage 0.95
differ from advantage 0.91
be more than mechanical advantage 0.90
be more than actual mechanical advantage 0.89
differ from ideal advantage 0.87
be more than actual advantage 0.79
be more than advantage 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(advantage, differ from advantage)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(advantage, be more than actual mechanical advantage)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(advantage, be more than actual mechanical advantage)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(advantage, differ from advantage)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(advantage, be more than actual mechanical advantage)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(advantage, be more than mechanical advantage)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(advantage, differ from ideal mechanical advantage)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(advantage, be more than mechanical advantage)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(advantage, be more than mechanical advantage)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(advantage, differ from ideal mechanical advantage)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(advantage, differ from ideal advantage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(advantage, be more than actual mechanical advantage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(advantage, differ from ideal mechanical advantage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(advantage, be more than actual advantage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(advantage, differ from advantage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(advantage, differ from ideal advantage)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(advantage, be more than actual advantage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(advantage, differ from ideal advantage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(advantage, be more than advantage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(advantage, be more than actual advantage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(advantage, be more than mechanical advantage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(advantage, be more than advantage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(advantage, be more than actual advantage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(advantage, be more than advantage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(advantage, differ from ideal advantage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(advantage, be more than advantage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(advantage, differ from ideal mechanical advantage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(advantage, differ from advantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(advantage, differ from mechanical advantage)