advertisement: be at tv

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.64
, campaign
Weight: 0.61
, event
Weight: 0.61
Siblings billboard
Weight: 0.61
, commercial
Weight: 0.61
, catalogue
Weight: 0.48
, ad
Weight: 0.35
, contest
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tv 1.00
wants to watch tv show 0.91
be at television 0.83
be at on television 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be at on television)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(commercial, be at on television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(commercial, be at on television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(advertisement, be at tv)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(advertisement, wants to watch tv show)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(advertisement, wants to watch tv show)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, wants to watch tv show)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(advertisement, wants to watch tv show)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(advertisement, be at television)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be at television)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be at television)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(advertisement, be at television)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be at tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(advertisement, be at tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be at tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(commercial, be at on television)