advertisement: be more harmful than goods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.64
, campaign
Weight: 0.61
, web page
Weight: 0.61
Siblings billboard
Weight: 0.61
, commercial
Weight: 0.61
, catalogue
Weight: 0.48
, ad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more harmful than goods 1.00
is harmful 0.80
is more expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(copy, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(copy, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(copy, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(copy, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(advertisement, is harmful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(advertisement, is harmful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(advertisement, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(copy, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(advertisement, be more harmful than goods)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(copy, is more expensive)