advertisement: is incredibly stupid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.64
, campaign
Weight: 0.61
, web page
Weight: 0.61
Siblings billboard
Weight: 0.61
, commercial
Weight: 0.61
, catalogue
Weight: 0.48
, ad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is incredibly stupid 1.00
is stupid 0.88
is ridiculously loud 0.84
is funny 0.81
is fucking weird 0.81
is absolutely terrible 0.81
is ridiculously thin 0.79
be bad too on subreddit 0.79
try funny 0.79
be on internet damn loud 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(commercial, try funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(commercial, try funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(commercial, try funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(advertisement, is incredibly stupid)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(advertisement, is funny)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(advertisement, is funny)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(advertisement, is funny)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is incredibly stupid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(advertisement, is incredibly stupid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is incredibly stupid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(commercial, try funny)