advertisement: is successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.64
, campaign
Weight: 0.61
, web page
Weight: 0.61
Siblings billboard
Weight: 0.61
, commercial
Weight: 0.61
, catalogue
Weight: 0.48
, ad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is successful 1.00
is more successful 0.95
be profitable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(campaign, is successful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(advertisement, is successful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(campaign, is more successful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(advertisement, is successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(campaign, is successful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(campaign, is more successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(campaign, is successful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(campaign, is more successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ad, is successful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ad, be profitable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(campaign, is successful)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(campaign, is more successful)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(advertisement, is successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ad, is successful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ad, is successful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ad, be profitable)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ad, be profitable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(advertisement, is successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(advertisement, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(campaign, is more successful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(campaign, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ad, is successful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ad, be profitable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(campaign, is successful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(advertisement, is successful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(campaign, is more successful)