advertising: affect consumers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect consumers 1.00
be to consumers 0.96
be for consumers 0.95
affect people 0.80
was important part of mass consumer society 0.77
be important to marketers 0.77
affect product 0.76
affect sell of product 0.75
affects people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(content, be important to marketers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(advertising, affect consumers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(content, be important to marketers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(content, be important to marketers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(content, be important to marketers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(advertising, affect consumers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(advertising, affect consumers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(advertising, be to consumers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be to consumers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for consumers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(advertising, be for consumers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(advertising, affect product)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(advertising, affect consumers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(advertising, affect consumers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(content, be important to marketers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(advertising, affect consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(content, be important to marketers)