advertising: influence use of product

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence use of product 1.00
influence use 0.90
have influence 0.86
affect product 0.84
influence growth 0.83
affect sell of product 0.81
have negative influence 0.81
have influence on society 0.80
have negative influence on society 0.78
influence economy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(investment, influence growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(advertising, influence use of product)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(investment, influence growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(investment, influence growth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(investment, influence growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(advertising, influence use of product)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(advertising, influence use of product)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(advertising, affect product)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(advertising, affect product)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(advertising, affect sell of product)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(advertising, have negative influence on society)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(advertising, affect product)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(advertising, affect product)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(advertising, have negative influence on society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(advertising, affect sell of product)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(advertising, have negative influence on society)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(advertising, have negative influence on society)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(advertising, affect sell of product)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(advertising, affect sell of product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(advertising, influence use of product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, influence growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(advertising, influence use of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, influence growth)