aetna: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.53
, plan
Weight: 0.52
, client
Weight: 0.48
, corporation
Weight: 0.45
, giant
Weight: 0.45
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.28
, blueprint
Weight: 0.28
, oil company
Weight: 0.27
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.27
, conglomerate
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(software company, has state jobs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(oil company, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(oil company, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(software company, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(software company, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(aetna, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aetna, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(aetna, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oil company, has state jobs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aetna, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(software company, has state jobs)