agenda: has physical part web

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.63
, forum
Weight: 0.34
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.33
, manifesto
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part web 1.00
is online 0.81
has physical part center 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has physical part center)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(meeting, has physical part center) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(meeting, has physical part center)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(agenda, has physical part web)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(agenda, is online)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(agenda, is online)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(agenda, is online)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agenda, is online)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has physical part web)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(agenda, has physical part web)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has physical part web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(meeting, has physical part center)