agent: hate zillow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate zillow 1.00
is hated 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(real estate agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(agent, hate zillow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(real estate agent, is hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(agent, hate zillow)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, hate zillow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is hated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, hate zillow)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is hated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(real estate agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(agent, hate zillow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(real estate agent, is hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(agent, hate zillow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(agent, hate zillow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(agent, hate zillow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(agent, hate zillow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(real estate agent, hate zillow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is hated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(real estate agent, hate zillow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(agent, hate zillow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is hated)