aging: be considered good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered good thing 1.00
be considered thing 0.97
is thing 0.91
is same thing 0.86
be in sport important to us 0.77
is bad people 0.76
be important in servicescapes 0.75
happen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(aging, be considered good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, is same thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(factor, is same thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, happen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, happen)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, happen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(aging, be considered good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(aging, be considered thing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(aging, is thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(aging, is thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(aging, be considered thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(aging, is thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(aging, be considered thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(aging, happen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(aging, happen)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(aging, happen)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aging, is thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(aging, happen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(aging, be considered good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, happen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(aging, be considered good thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)