aging: is awful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is awful 1.00
were in trenches awful 0.84
is bad people 0.77
is scary 0.77
is depressing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(condition, were in trenches awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aging, is awful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(condition, were in trenches awful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(condition, were in trenches awful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(condition, were in trenches awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aging, is awful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aging, is awful)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(aging, is scary)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aging, is depressing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(aging, is depressing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(aging, is depressing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aging, is scary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(aging, is scary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(aging, is scary)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(aging, is depressing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(aging, is awful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aging, is awful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(condition, were in trenches awful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aging, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(condition, were in trenches awful)