aging: make wine taste better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
make wine taste better 1.00
affect taste of wine 0.96
be for wine 0.91
affect taste 0.84
be with microbrewed beer 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(issue, be with microbrewed beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aging, make wine taste better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(issue, be with microbrewed beer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(issue, be with microbrewed beer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(issue, be with microbrewed beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(aging, make wine taste better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(aging, make wine taste better)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(aging, be for wine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aging, affect taste of wine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(aging, affect taste)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(aging, affect taste of wine)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(aging, be for wine)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(aging, be for wine)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aging, affect taste)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(aging, affect taste of wine)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aging, affect taste)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(aging, affect taste)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(aging, affect taste of wine)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(aging, be for wine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aging, make wine taste better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(issue, be with microbrewed beer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aging, make wine taste better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(issue, be with microbrewed beer)