agriculture: be good for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, ministry
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.35
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, textile
Weight: 0.34
, education
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for economy 1.00
be important for economy 0.96
be important to economy 0.95
is economy 0.94
was important to economy 0.94
help economy 0.92
affect economy 0.90
was problem in economy 0.88
be important for indian economy 0.83
be backbone of economy 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(agriculture, be good for economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sector, be important to economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important to economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be good for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(agriculture, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agriculture, help economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(agriculture, was problem in economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, help economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(agriculture, was problem in economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was problem in economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, was problem in economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(agriculture, help economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, help economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(agriculture, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(agriculture, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)