agriculture: was important to early humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, ministry
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.35
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, textile
Weight: 0.34
, education
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to early humans 1.00
was important to humans 0.94
be important to humans 0.91
be considered important to humans 0.89
be good for humans 0.88
be considered very important to humans 0.86
be considered very important to mankind 0.78
was important in egyptians 0.77
be important to mayans 0.77
be considered important to mankind 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(agriculture, was important to early humans)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(agriculture, be important to mayans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(agriculture, be important to mayans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be important to mayans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be important to mayans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important to early humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(agriculture, was important to early humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important to early humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to humans)