ai: has time future

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.52
, program
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, city
Weight: 0.45
, artist
Weight: 0.44
Siblings bing
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, september
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has time future 1.00
be important to future 0.92
hold future potential 0.88
be important to future of computing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ai, has time future)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ai, be important to future)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ai, be important to future)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ai, hold future potential)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ai, hold future potential)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ai, be important to future of computing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ai, be important to future)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ai, hold future potential)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ai, be important to future of computing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ai, be important to future)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ai, hold future potential)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ai, be important to future of computing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ai, be important to future of computing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ai, has time future)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ai, has time future) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ai, has time future)