:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ai, is scary)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(city, is dangerous)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, is dangerous)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(ai, is scary)
Similarity expansion
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ai, is dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ai, is interesting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ai, is stupid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ai, is dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ai, is dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ai, is stupid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ai, is stupid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ai, is interesting)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ai, is stupid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ai, is interesting)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ai, is dangerous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ai, is interesting)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ai, is scary)
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ai, is scary)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ai, is scary)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)