air conditioner: be rated in btu

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air
Weight: 0.74
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.72
, ventilation system
Weight: 0.71
, compressor
Weight: 0.69
Siblings hot air
Weight: 0.37
, air horn
Weight: 0.35
, fresh air
Weight: 0.35
, heater
Weight: 0.33
, heating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated in btu 1.00
be rated in tons 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(air conditioning, be rated in tons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(air conditioner, be rated in btu)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, be rated in tons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, be rated in tons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(air conditioning, be rated in tons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, be rated in btu)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(air conditioner, be rated in btu)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(air conditioner, be rated in tons)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(air conditioner, be rated in tons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, be rated in tons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, be rated in tons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, be rated in btu)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(air conditioner, be rated in btu)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(air conditioning, be rated in tons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(air conditioner, be rated in btu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(air conditioning, be rated in tons)