air conditioning: use more fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ventilation system
Weight: 0.71
, equipment
Weight: 0.67
, ventilation
Weight: 0.67
, field
Weight: 0.66
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.72
, cockpit
Weight: 0.52
, training
Weight: 0.34
, football field
Weight: 0.34
, fitness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use more fuel 1.00
use fuel 0.97
affect fuel consumption 0.85
use up gasoline 0.84
use energy 0.81
affect gas mileage 0.79
use electricity 0.77
have energy 0.77
is less efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(field, have energy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(field, have energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(field, have energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is less efficient)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, use electricity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(field, have energy)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(air conditioner, use electricity)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, use electricity)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(air conditioner, is less efficient)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, is less efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(air conditioning, use more fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(air conditioning, use fuel)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, use fuel)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(air conditioning, affect fuel consumption)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(air conditioning, use fuel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use fuel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use up gasoline)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, affect fuel consumption)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(air conditioning, use up gasoline)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(air conditioning, affect fuel consumption)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, affect fuel consumption)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, affect gas mileage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, use up gasoline)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(air conditioning, affect gas mileage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air conditioning, affect gas mileage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, affect gas mileage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(air conditioning, use up gasoline)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(field, have energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(air conditioner, use electricity)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is less efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(air conditioning, use more fuel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(field, have energy)