air pollution: be bad in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in california 1.00
be bad in mexico city 0.82
be bad in india 0.81
be bad in london 0.78
be in mexico city considered 0.77
be in japan 0.77
be problem in india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad in california)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in california)