air pollution: be bad in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in china 1.00
be in china 0.95
be problem in china 0.91
increase in china 0.87
be bad in india 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in china)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad in china)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad in china)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad in china)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(air pollution, be in china)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be in china)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(air pollution, increase in china)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(air pollution, increase in china)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, increase in china)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, be problem in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(air pollution, increase in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad in china)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(air pollution, be bad in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad in china)