air travel: be in canada expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents travel
Weight: 0.68
, service
Weight: 0.67
, public transport
Weight: 0.66
, cost
Weight: 0.62
, airport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agency
Weight: 0.39
, travel agent
Weight: 0.38
, air ticket
Weight: 0.36
, flight
Weight: 0.35
, escort service
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada expensive 1.00
be expensive in canada 1.00
be in canada 0.95
be expensive in india 0.88
be cheaper in europe 0.82
be in europe 0.78
be important to economy of uk 0.77
be important to uk economy 0.77
be on mac 0.77
walmart 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(airport, be important to economy of uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(airport, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cost, walmart)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(airport, be on mac)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(airport, be on mac)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(travel, be expensive in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cost, walmart)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(airport, be important to uk economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(airport, be important to economy of uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(airport, be on mac)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(travel, be expensive in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, walmart)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(airport, be important to uk economy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(airport, be important to economy of uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(airport, be important to economy of uk)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(airport, be important to uk economy)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cost, walmart)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(airport, be on mac)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(air travel, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(air travel, be in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air travel, be expensive in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(air travel, be cheaper in europe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(air travel, be expensive in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(air travel, be expensive in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(air travel, be cheaper in europe)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(air travel, be cheaper in europe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be cheaper in europe)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in europe)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(air travel, be in europe)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(airport, be on mac)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cost, walmart)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(travel, be expensive in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(airport, be important to economy of uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(airport, be important to uk economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(travel, be expensive in canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(airport, be on mac)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cost, walmart)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(airport, be important to economy of uk)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(airport, be important to uk economy)