air travel: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents travel
Weight: 0.68
, service
Weight: 0.67
, public transport
Weight: 0.66
, cost
Weight: 0.62
, airport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agency
Weight: 0.39
, travel agent
Weight: 0.38
, air ticket
Weight: 0.36
, flight
Weight: 0.35
, escort service
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state running 0.76
be in stuttgart work 0.76
has state leadership 0.76
work in zurich 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(public transport, be in stuttgart work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(air travel, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in stuttgart work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in stuttgart work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escort service, work in zurich)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(public transport, be in stuttgart work)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(air travel, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escort service, work in zurich)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(escort service, work in zurich)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(air travel, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(air travel, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(public transport, be in stuttgart work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(escort service, work in zurich)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(air travel, has state job)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(public transport, be in stuttgart work)