air: is light

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.59
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.74
, hot air
Weight: 0.73
, air horn
Weight: 0.62
, fresh air
Weight: 0.58
, brimstone
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
is light 1.00
distort light 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hot air, distort light)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, is light)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, is light)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hot air, is light)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hot air, distort light)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot air, distort light)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(air, is light)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(air, distort light)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(air, distort light)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(air, distort light)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(air, distort light)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(air, is light)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(air, is light)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hot air, is light)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(air, is light)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot air, distort light)