airbag: fail deploy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, system
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, product
Weight: 0.52
Siblings electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, cooling device
Weight: 0.34
, windshield wiper
Weight: 0.34
, brake
Weight: 0.34
, car alarm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail deploy 1.00
deploy 0.95
fail 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(system, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(airbag, fail deploy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(product, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(airbag, fail deploy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(product, fail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(system, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(product, fail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(system, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(brake, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(system, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(airbag, fail deploy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(product, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(airbag, fail deploy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(brake, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(brake, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(airbag, fail deploy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(airbag, deploy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(airbag, deploy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(airbag, deploy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(airbag, fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(airbag, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(airbag, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(airbag, deploy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(airbag, fail deploy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(product, fail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(system, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brake, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(product, fail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(airbag, fail deploy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(system, fail)