aircraft: be controlled in flight

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plane
Weight: 0.68
, drone
Weight: 0.63
, craft
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.72
, helicopter
Weight: 0.72
, landing gear
Weight: 0.66
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.65
, paraglider
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be controlled in flight 1.00
was different from aircraft 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drone, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aircraft, be controlled in flight)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drone, be controlled in flight)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drone, be controlled in flight)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drone, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(aircraft, be controlled in flight)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(aircraft, be controlled in flight)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, was different from aircraft)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(aircraft, was different from aircraft)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(aircraft, was different from aircraft)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aircraft, was different from aircraft)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, be controlled in flight)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aircraft, be controlled in flight)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drone, be controlled in flight)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(aircraft, be controlled in flight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drone, be controlled in flight)