airplane seat: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seat
Weight: 0.79
Siblings car seat
Weight: 0.42
, seat belt
Weight: 0.39
, chair
Weight: 0.35
, aisle
Weight: 0.33
, stool
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80
has shape solid 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(car seat, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chair, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chair, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(stool, has shape solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chair, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chair, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chair, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(car seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(car seat, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chair, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chair, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chair, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chair, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(stool, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(stool, has shape solid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(airplane seat, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(airplane seat, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chair, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(car seat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chair, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chair, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(stool, has shape solid)