airplane: have hole in window

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.65
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, carrier
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.60
Siblings jet
Weight: 0.57
, aircraft
Weight: 0.36
, airline
Weight: 0.35
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.35
, car
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hole in window 1.00
have holes in window 0.97
have windows 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, have windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(aircraft, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(aircraft, have windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(airplane, have hole in window)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(airplane, have holes in window)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(airplane, have holes in window)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(airplane, have holes in window)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(airplane, have holes in window)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(airplane, have windows)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(airplane, have windows)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(airplane, have windows)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(airplane, have windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(airplane, have hole in window)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(airplane, have hole in window)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(airplane, have hole in window) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(aircraft, have windows)