alabama: be good at football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at football 1.00
is best football team 0.91
is greatest football team 0.86
play football in orlando 0.83
play bad teams 0.79
ever have good kicker 0.77
have bad kickers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(alabama, be good at football)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(alabama, play football in orlando)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(alabama, play football in orlando)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(alabama, play football in orlando)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(alabama, play football in orlando)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alabama, is best football team)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best football team)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(alabama, ever have good kicker)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alabama, ever have good kicker)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best football team)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alabama, ever have good kicker)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(alabama, is best football team)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(alabama, ever have good kicker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be good at football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(alabama, be good at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(alabama, be good at football)