alan turing: was figure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mathematician
Weight: 0.65
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.60
, giant
Weight: 0.59
, genius
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.56
Siblings john von neumann
Weight: 0.36
, isaac newton
Weight: 0.35
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.35
, james clerk maxwell
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was figure 1.00
was significant figure 0.90
was recognised 0.75
was reamembered 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(albert einstein, was recognised)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(albert einstein, was reamembered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(albert einstein, was reamembered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(albert einstein, was reamembered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(albert einstein, was recognised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(albert einstein, was recognised)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(alan turing, was figure)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alan turing, was significant figure)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(alan turing, was significant figure)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(alan turing, was significant figure)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(alan turing, was significant figure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alan turing, was figure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(alan turing, was figure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(albert einstein, was reamembered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alan turing, was figure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(albert einstein, was recognised)