alarm: be in stores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents smoke alarm
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, noise
Weight: 0.61
, security system
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fire alarm
Weight: 0.82
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.71
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.70
, siren
Weight: 0.55
, burglar
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in stores 1.00
go off in stores 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(alarm, be in stores)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(alarm, go off in stores)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(alarm, go off in stores)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(alarm, go off in stores)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alarm, go off in stores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(alarm, be in stores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(alarm, be in stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(alarm, be in stores)