alaska: be biggest state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.65
, region
Weight: 0.62
, country
Weight: 0.62
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.36
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be biggest state 1.00
is big 0.81
is most earthquake-prone state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(canada, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(alaska, be biggest state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(canada, is big)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(canada, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(canada, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(alaska, be biggest state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(alaska, be biggest state)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(alaska, is most earthquake-prone state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is most earthquake-prone state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(alaska, is most earthquake-prone state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(alaska, is most earthquake-prone state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be biggest state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(alaska, be biggest state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(canada, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(alaska, be biggest state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(canada, is big)