alexandria: was started

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, city
Weight: 0.53
, port
Weight: 0.51
, town
Weight: 0.51
, center
Weight: 0.49
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.28
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.28
, new york city
Weight: 0.27
, village
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was started 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(salt lake city, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(salt lake city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(salt lake city, was started)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(quebec city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(quebec city, was started)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(alexandria, was started)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(alexandria, was started)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(salt lake city, was started)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(alexandria, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(quebec city, was started)