algorithm: be important in problem solving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in problem solving 1.00
be use solve 0.87
be important in problem 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(method, be use solve)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in problem solving)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(method, be use solve)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(method, be use solve)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(method, be use solve)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in problem solving)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in problem solving)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in problem solving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in problem solving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be use solve)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(algorithm, be important in problem solving)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(method, be use solve)