alienation: is common workplace experience

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, theme
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, polarization
Weight: 0.34
, isolation
Weight: 0.33
, apathy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is common workplace experience 1.00
is workplace experience 0.95
is common 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, is common)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(loneliness, is common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(loneliness, is common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(alienation, is common workplace experience)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(alienation, is workplace experience)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(alienation, is common)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(alienation, is workplace experience)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(alienation, is workplace experience)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(alienation, is common)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(alienation, is common)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(alienation, is workplace experience)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(alienation, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(alienation, is common workplace experience)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(alienation, is common workplace experience)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(alienation, is common workplace experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(loneliness, is common)