alignment: be important in project management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.59
Siblings camber
Weight: 0.40
, configuration
Weight: 0.35
, angle
Weight: 0.34
, orientation
Weight: 0.33
, polarity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in project management 1.00
is management 0.86
management 0.85
be important in construction 0.82
be important in design 0.78
be important in business 0.77
be used in construction 0.76
be important in construction of buildings 0.76
be important in hrm process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in project management)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in project management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(angle, be used in construction)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(angle, be important in construction of buildings)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(angle, be important in construction)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(configuration, management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(configuration, is management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(configuration, is management)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(configuration, is management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(configuration, management)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(configuration, management)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(angle, be important in construction)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(angle, be important in construction)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(angle, be used in construction)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(angle, be used in construction)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(orientation, be important in hrm process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(angle, be important in construction of buildings)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(angle, be important in construction of buildings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(alignment, be important in project management)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(alignment, be important in design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(alignment, be important in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(alignment, be important in design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alignment, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in project management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(configuration, is management)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(configuration, management)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(orientation, be important in hrm process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(angle, be used in construction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(angle, be important in construction)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(angle, be important in construction of buildings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(alignment, be important in project management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)