alignment: be in organization important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.59
Siblings camber
Weight: 0.40
, configuration
Weight: 0.35
, angle
Weight: 0.34
, orientation
Weight: 0.33
, polarity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in organization important 1.00
be in organization 0.96
be important in business 0.77
be important to life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(attribute, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(alignment, be in organization important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important to life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important to life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(polarity, be important to life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(attribute, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(polarity, be important to life)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(polarity, be important to life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(alignment, be in organization important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(alignment, be in organization)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(alignment, be in organization)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(alignment, be in organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(alignment, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alignment, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(alignment, be in organization important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(attribute, be important to life)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(polarity, be important to life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(attribute, be important to life)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(alignment, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)