alpaca: be kept with sheep

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be kept with sheep 1.00
protect sheep 0.86
keep away foxes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect sheep)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(llama, protect sheep)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(llama, protect sheep)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(alpaca, be kept with sheep)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(alpaca, protect sheep)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, keep away foxes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(alpaca, keep away foxes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(alpaca, keep away foxes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(alpaca, keep away foxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(alpaca, be kept with sheep)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(llama, be kept with sheep)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(llama, protect sheep)