alpaca: defend themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.89
defend against predators 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect themselves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(prairie dog, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(llama, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(llama, protect themselves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(prairie dog, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(alpaca, defend themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(alpaca, protect themselves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend against predators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(alpaca, defend against predators)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(alpaca, protect themselves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(alpaca, defend against predators)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(alpaca, defend against predators)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(alpaca, protect themselves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(alpaca, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(prairie dog, defend themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(llama, protect themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(prairie dog, protect themselves)