:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sheep, mate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(llama, mate)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(llama, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(llama, mate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sheep, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sheep, mate)
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(alpaca, mate)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alpaca, mate)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sheep, mate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(llama, mate)